tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6740338341177826314.post6907951629312164704..comments2024-03-28T09:19:27.711+00:00Comments on A Portal to a Portal: Mmmmmmmmmmmm, rich :-)Dave Hayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10444759805764485699noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6740338341177826314.post-24002852209786890732008-01-10T19:13:00.000+00:002008-01-10T19:13:00.000+00:00Hi JonYes, is that cool or what ?Seriously, I see ...Hi Jon<BR/><BR/>Yes, is that cool or what ?<BR/><BR/>Seriously, I see this as a big step forward; you get all the benefits of WebSphere Portlet Factory e.g. model-driven development, reuse, code-free/light builders etc. whilst developing thin-client and rich-client user interfaces.<BR/><BR/>*CAVEAT* It's worth noting that I have not make any judgement regarding license entitlements. My initial understanding is that an end-customer would need to have a WebSphere Portlet Factory Runtime entitlement in order to be adequately licensed to run a portlet in the Notes client where WebSphere Portal wasn't in the mix *CAVEAT*Dave Hayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10444759805764485699noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6740338341177826314.post-88929148242127354702008-01-10T09:29:00.000+00:002008-01-10T09:29:00.000+00:00Dave - does this mean from a single codebase you c...Dave - does this mean from a single codebase you can generate either a Portlet for WebSphere or an app for Notes 8?Jon Mellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05274148586653973726noreply@blogger.com